Windows vs Linux
Windows vs Linux
Introduction:-People often think of the continuous struggle between Windows and OSX.
Which is the world’s most popular system? We put Windows and
Linux head-to-head to see whether your business should make the switch to the
open source operating system.
Windows vs Linux: User-friendliness
When it comes to user-friendliness and how accessible an OS is
to first-time users, Windows is a clear cut above the competition.The fact that
Microsoft has been producing its system software for nearly 30 years means that
many aspects of it have become cultural touchstones.
However, Linux is an operating system that gets simpler to use
the more you understand about it, while Windows can sometimes be the opposite.
Digging down past the basic tasks into more complicated functions can leave
some people baffled.
Microsoft, to its credit, has spent the past few years
simplifying the more confusing and labyrinthine elements of its software, and
generally making it much more accessible for entry-level users that aren’t
necessarily computer literate.
This is especially evident in Windows 8.1’s settings menu, which
boils down some of the most common and crucial control panel tasks and lays
them out under clear and concise headings. It’s a lot more straightforward for
the layperson, and the control panel’s still available for power users to
tinker with.
Windows vs Linux: Installation
Still with us? Good; now we move on to looking at installation.
Again, this differs a little from Windows methods, as well as varying between
distros.
A common feature of Linux OS’ is the ability to ‘live’ boot them
– that is, booting from a DVD or USB image without having to actually install
the OS on your machine. This can be a great way to quickly test out if you like
a distro without having to commit to it.
Windows vs Linux: Layout, Design and User Interface
As we mentioned above, the sheer volume of distros means that
users are spoilt for choice in terms of design. There are distros that visually
emulate both OSX and Windows, as well as stripped-down systems for those that
favour minimalism.
Some, of course, are visually dire, but that's the risk of
community-created software. Most of the major distros, however, are very
well-designed, particularly corporate-backed offerings such as Ubuntu and
Fedora.
In the end, a lot of it comes down to personal taste. We should
mention, though, that many Linux variants will require an adjustment period for
those familiar with Windows or OSX. They’re also just that little bit less
polished when compared with the big boys
Windows vs Linux: Support
As it’s created and maintained by a community of passionate
fans, Linux has a huge wealth of information to fall back on, in the form of
tips, tricks, forums and tutorials from other users and developers.
However, it’s somewhat fragmented and disarrayed, with little in
the way of a comprehensive, cohesive support structure. Instead, anyone with a
problem has to brave the wilderness of Google to find another user with the
answer.
Microsoft is much better at collating its resources. Though it
doesn’t have quite the amount of raw information that’s available regarding
Linux, it’s made sure that the help documents it does have are relatively clear
and easy to access.
There’s also a similar network of Windows forums and tutorials
if the official assistance doesn't help you.
Windows vs Linux: Performance
Microsoft’s ubiquitous OS can be called many things, but
‘lightweight and speedy’ is not one of them. Windows has an unfortunate
tendency towards bloating and sluggishness, and can very quickly feel outdated
if not properly maintained.
Linux is much quicker, on the whole. The OS itself is less
demanding, and many distros sacrifice any visual bells and whistles to ensure
that performance is the absolute best it can be. Opting for one of these builds
can be an excellent way to bring an ailing older laptop back up to its former
speed.
There are, of course, numerous ways to ensure that a Windows PC
or laptop remains decently nippy over the course of its lifespan, but Linux
computers will on average outperform them over a longer period.
Windows vs Linux: Software and compatibility
The vast majority of programs are written predominantly for
Windows. While there are many that also have Linux-compatible versions, the sad
fact is that a lot of popular Windows software simply isn’t available on Linux.
There are always ways around this, however. The open source
community has created free alternatives to basically every program you could
wish for, and has devised workarounds, such as emulating them in virtual
machines, for the few that it can’t recreate.
Still, these replacements are often homebrewed, and feel like
poor relations in comparison to the originals. If your business depends on
specialist software, we’d strongly advise checking that this software either
supports Linux or has an adequate substitute before making the jump.
Another key difference from Windows is the method of
installation. Rather than downloading a nice, neat .exe file, most Linux
programs install from within your distro’s software repositories.
Windows vs Linux: Security
Security is a cornerstone of the Linux OS, and one of the principal
reasons for its popularity among the IT community. This reputation is well
deserved, and stems from a number of contributing factors.
One of the most effective ways Linux secures its systems is
through privileges. Linux does not grant full administrator – or ‘root’ -
access to user accounts by default, whereas Windows does. Instead, accounts are
usually lower-level, and have no privileges within the wider system.
This means that when a virus gets in, the damage it can do is
limited, and restricted mainly to files and folders on the individual machine.
This can be greatly beneficial from a damage control standpoint, since it’s far
easier to simply replace one machine than scour the entire network for malware
traces.
Comments
Post a Comment